I’m seeing Google make recipe results in AI Mode more publisher friendly with a new visual treatment that gives recipe creators more visibility. For some recipe responses, Google is now showing details such as the creator name, recipe ratings, and the number of ingredients.
What is new. Google’s Robby Stein said AI Mode now includes “prominent links at the top of responses with useful details and images,” including creator names, ratings, and ingredient counts. From my view, the key shift is that Google is trying to make recipe sources easier to recognize and visit directly from AI Mode.
I also noticed that Google has been testing top stories carousels in AI Overviews, although that feature does not appear to be live yet.
What it looks like. The new treatment places recipe links, images, and useful recipe details more prominently in the AI Mode experience, giving users a clearer path from the AI-generated response back to the original recipe page.

Previously. Back in March, Robby Stein announced earlier changes to recipe results in AI Mode. At the time, he said Google had heard feedback and was making updates to better connect people with recipe creators across the web.

I see this latest update as part of Google’s effort to address concerns around AI recipe slop and to make original recipe content more visible when people search for cooking ideas through AI-powered results.
Why I care. Recipe bloggers, and content creators more broadly, have been frustrated that Google’s AI experiences often send less traffic than traditional search results. This update suggests Google is trying to encourage more searchers to click through from AI Mode to the publishers and creators behind the recipes.
If Google continues adding more clickable link units into AI search experiences, I think it could help ease some of the tension between publishers and Google. The bigger question is whether these changes will drive enough meaningful traffic back to recipe sites and other content creators.
Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.


Leave a Reply