Overcoming Google’s Biggest Crawling Challenges: A Personal Review

```json
{
  "alt": "Google logo superimposed on a colorful spider web background.",
  "caption": "A Google logo meets a vibrant spider web, illustrating the intricate and colorful nature of the web and the digital world.",
  "description": "In this image, the Google logo is superimposed over a colorful spider web, symbolizing the interconnected nature of the internet. The web features a gradient of vibrant hues, creating a striking visual effect. This composition highlights themes of complexity, connection, and the digital network. Keywords: Google, spider web, internet, digital, colorful."
}
```

Managing my website’s URLs efficiently is crucial to prevent crawlers from slowing it down. If you’re like me, you want your site to load fast, ensuring both visitors and search engines have a seamless experience.

Just the other day, I listened to Google’s latest insights on their year-end report for 2025. It was fascinating to hear Gary Illyes discuss on the Search Off the Record podcast about the major crawling challenges Google faces, like faceted navigation and action parameters, which make up a whopping 75% of the issues.

What’s the issue? Well, I’ve learned that crawling problems can seriously impact site performance, potentially making it unusable or inaccessible. Crawlers can sometimes get stuck in an infinite loop on a site, wreaking havoc on server performance.

According to Gary, once a set of URLs is discovered, the crawler has to check a significant portion to determine its quality. By the time this is done, the damage is done—your site slows down dramatically.

The Biggest Crawling Challenges Here’s what caught my attention as the major issues from the report:

  • 50% relate to faceted navigation. These are very common in e-commerce sites where endless filtering options exist for products based on size, color, price, etc.
  • 25% pertain to action parameters. These come from URL parameters that trigger actions instead of significantly changing page content.
  • 10% involve irrelevant parameters like session IDs or UTMs.
  • 5% are due to plugins or widgets that cause confusion by creating problematic URLs.
  • 2% encapsulate other “weird stuff”, which includes strange issues like double-encoded URLs.

Why this matters to me is simple. A well-structured URL strategy keeps my server healthy, ensures quick page loads, and prevents search engines from misunderstanding which URLs should be indexed as canonical.

The Podcast: Here’s where you can listen to the discussion yourself:


Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.


crushpress.ai community screenshot

FAQs

Why can URL management affect site crawling and performance?

The post explains that inefficient URL structures can cause crawlers to slow a site down. When crawlers get stuck checking large sets of URLs or loops, server performance can suffer and pages may load more slowly.

What were Google’s biggest crawling challenges in the 2025 year-end report discussion?

The article highlights faceted navigation and action parameters as the largest issues, making up 75% of the crawling challenges discussed. It also mentions irrelevant parameters, plugins or widgets, and unusual URL problems like double-encoded URLs.

Why is faceted navigation a crawling problem?

Faceted navigation can create many URL combinations from filters such as size, color, and price. The post notes this is especially common on e-commerce sites and accounts for 50% of the issues discussed.

What are action parameters in URLs?

Action parameters are URL parameters that trigger actions instead of meaningfully changing page content. According to the post, they account for 25% of the crawling challenges covered in the report.

How can crawling problems affect canonical indexing?

The post says a well-structured URL strategy helps prevent search engines from misunderstanding which URLs should be indexed as canonical. Without that clarity, crawlers may spend time on low-value or confusing URL variants.

Which smaller URL issues does the article mention?

The article names irrelevant parameters such as session IDs or UTMs, plugins or widgets that create problematic URLs, and unusual cases such as double-encoded URLs. These smaller categories still contribute to crawler confusion and site performance issues.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *