I recently came across some exciting updates from Google that are designed to enhance the way we search for and interact with content. Google is introducing new features to its AI experiences, including AI Mode and AI Overviews, by incorporating preferred sources along with a perspectives carousel and highly cited labels.
Preferred Sources in AI Mode and AI Overviews. One of the updates brings preferred sources to AI search results. According to Duncan Osborn, Product Manager at Google Search, users will now be able to easily identify links in AI responses from sources they have selected. I find this particularly beneficial as it helps me quickly access content from sources I trust.
I saw Google testing this feature recently, and now we have the final version that’s rolling out. There will be a label highlighting preferred sources within AI results, making it noticeable to us. It’s fascinating how this is now available globally and in all languages. Google mentions that users have selected over 345,000 unique sources, and these sources receive double the click-through rate. For those interested in trying it out, you can find more details in Google’s documentation.
Perspectives Carousel. Another interesting addition is the perspectives carousel. Google will present a new carousel for certain searches, tailored to help us dive deeper into specific topics, especially when they’re rapidly evolving. The carousel will prominently feature our preferred sources, making recent articles more accessible across various search queries.
In addition to this, there’s also a carousel that shows helpful perspectives from online discussions, forums, and social media. This is a wonderful way for us to tap into diverse viewpoints, broadening our understanding of topics that interest us. These features are being rolled out in AI Mode and AI Overviews.
Highly Cited Label. Finally, Google is expanding the highly cited label to more web article links within search results. This feature makes it easier to find articles that many other stories refer to. It’s a fantastic tool for me to trace a story back to its primary reporting, ensuring that I am viewing the original source of information. This feature will be available across Google Search, beyond just AI-specific functions.
I’m excited to share that Google has announced some transformative updates to its search capabilities. These updates include the introduction of information agents and enhanced agentic experiences that will elevate how we interact with search. Google’s AI will continuously scan the web, ensuring we receive the most current information, much like a personal assistant would.
In a recent announcement, Google revealed new search agents, focusing on information agents and additional agentic functionalities within Google Search. These information agents are designed to monitor the web for changes to our tasks, seamlessly supporting us on our journey through various challenges and questions.
Liz Reid, the head of Google Search, stated, “We’re entering the era of Search agents, where you can easily create, customize, and manage multiple AI agents for your many tasks, right in Search.” This new era provides a unique opportunity to tailor search experiences to our specific needs.
Information Agents. These agents are designed to keep us informed about our questions and tasks. Google’s agents will intelligently sift through the internet—exploring blogs, news sites, social posts, and accessing the freshest real-time data on finance, shopping, and sports, to ensure we receive the most relevant updates on our inquiries.
The information agents will then compile an “intelligent, synthesized update” that not only provides the necessary information but also enables us to take action.
The Example. Envision yourself apartment hunting. You can simply input all your specific requirements, and your agent will continuously scan listings, alerting you whenever a match surfaces. Similarly, if you’re keen on not missing any sneaker collaborations from your favorite athletes, your agent will notify you about new releases.
Availability. These exciting capabilities are set to roll out this summer, initially available to Google AI Pro & Ultra subscribers.
Agentic Experiences. Google is also extending its agentic booking capabilities within Google Search to encompass new tasks like finding local experiences and services. Imagine effortlessly booking a private karaoke room for an exact time and with specific food options, all handled by Google Search.
Google will provide the most current pricing and availability information, along with direct links for purchase, streamlining experiences across various services, including home, repair, beauty, and pet care. These features are expected in the U.S. this summer.
Personal Intelligence Expanding. In addition, Google has revealed plans to broaden its Personal Intelligence feature within AI Mode, now reaching around 200 countries and territories, supporting 98 languages.
You know what I’m starting to realize? Our customers see the entire search engine results page (SERP). So, if they do, shouldn’t we?
Back in February 2024, Gartner predicted a 25% decrease in traditional search volume by 2026. But guess what? That didn’t happen. Google’s search revenue soared by 17% year-over-year, hitting over $63 billion in just the last quarter of 2025. While query volume is surging, clicks per search are on the decline. It’s like the pie got bigger, but the slices are being divvied up differently, and many of us are still optimizing for that old pie.
I have a question for you: Are we stuck rifling through endless spreadsheets of organic keyword rankings like it’s still 2003? Our customers don’t care about where they get their answers; they just want them to be trustworthy. And they’re finding those answers across a wide array of platforms that our standard rank trackers might not even be aware of.
If our organic, paid, and AI search strategies are operating in separate silos, we might be optimizing for a search experience that’s obsolete.
What Search Really Looks Like Today
Go ahead and Google “best tax software” right now. I’ll wait.
Notice the variety on just one results page: top sponsored ads, an AI Overview citation, a Reddit thread (because people trust real people more than brands), organic listings from CNET and H&R Block, a video carousel, discussion forum links, a product carousel with prices, more sponsored results at the bottom, and a “People also search for” section directing the next inquiry.
This is one search with one keyword, and nobody truly owns it.
Reflect on how different folks use that page. I’ll scroll right to the Reddit thread, seeking genuine human recommendations. My dad clicks the first sponsored ad, trusting Google to display the best option up top. Someone else might read the AI Overview and feel content enough with the answer to avoid further clicking. A fourth person might watch that Smart Family Money video and depart satisfied.
Same query, four distinct paths, four different “winners.” As a brand, if we’re celebrating being third in organic ranking on this page, we should realize that most of the attention and user engagement may be happening beyond those blue links.
That’s why I emphasize understanding the total SERP experience. If our customers are seeing the whole picture, shouldn’t we?
The AI Layer Changes the Equation
AI Overviews now appear on around 25% to 48% of Google queries, according to various studies. ChatGPT processes 2.5 billion prompts daily. Perplexity’s up by 239% year over year—hard figures from platforms shaping consumer opinions about our brands. Yikes, right?
But let’s not start panicking. AI might be shifting the terrain, but it only represents less than 1% of U.S. web traffic. Google, on the other hand, drives referrals 300 times more than all AI platforms combined.
The significant transformation lies in consumer behavior. According to Wynter’s 2026 research, 68% of B2B buyers initiate their research within AI tools before heading to Google. They use ChatGPT to narrow down options, then verify them on Google. AI evaluates, Google validates, and it’s on us to convert. If we aren’t in that initial AI conversation, we’re missing the chance to be a go-to choice.
Why the Click Data is Intriguing, Not Alarming
A Search Engine Land study of 25 million organic impressions revealed that organic CTR drops by 61% when an AI Overview is present, with paid CTR plummeting by 68%.
It’s tempting to go into panic mode but don’t hit the alarm just yet.
Here’s an interesting finding: brands cited in AI Overviews experience a 35% increase in organic clicks and a 91% rise in paid clicks. The AI Overview acts as a trust signal, boosting user engagement below the overview itself.
Interestingly, ranking high in organic doesn’t automatically put you in the AI’s radar. Research by Tom Capper at Moz shows that 88% of AI Mode citations don’t appear in the organic SERPs for the same query. Organic and AI sources differ. You could be the top Google result but completely invisible in a ChatGPT response to the same query.
But here’s a glimmer of hope—traffic from AI tends to convert at quadruple the rate of organic traffic. Its audience arrives informed and ready to make decisions after preliminary evaluation in the AI space.
The Organizational Chart is the Roadblock
Most organizations have SEO reporting to content, PPC to demand gen, and AI search to no one, effectively stranding strategic coherence. BrightEdge found 54% of organizations delegate AI search solely to SEO teams, akin to entrusting your plumber with your electrical work because it’s all in the same house.
The losses here are tangible. One Performance Max campaign paid a staggering $500,000 for clicks that were coming naturally through organic referrals. Google’s studies confirm that when you’re organically ranked first, half of your paid clicks might as well have been free.
Moreover, McKinsey’s findings show a brand’s own website contributes only 5% to 10% of sources AI refers to. AI aggregates from Reddit, review sites, affiliates, and more. A top-tier SEO program might still leave you out in the cold when it comes to AI, as it’s influenced more by collective sentiment than official content.
A unified strategy works wonders. At Level, we cut acquisition costs by 18% and increased SEO leads by 22% by merging paid and organic efforts for a B2B SaaS client. Our Level Intelligence Suite connects performance signals across search surfaces, proving that compartmentalizing these efforts is a missed opportunity for synergy.
Three Audits You Can Kickstart on Monday
If you’re looking for a fast start, here are three audits using your top 20 keywords to pinpoint gaps and opportunities.
Lens 1: Check Where You’re Really Visible. Analyze your organic rankings, paid ad presence, and AI search visibility across platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Use Semrush’s free AI visibility checker to see where you really stand.
Lens 2: Identify Unnecessary Ad Spend. Correlate your top organic rankings with active PPC bids. Begin with branded keywords, where over-expenditure from paying for organic reach is typically largest.
Lens 3: Discover AI Overlooking. Compare your organic presence with AI citations. Only 11% of domains are noted by ChatGPT and Perplexity, so strength in one area doesn’t ensure visibility in the other. Ensure your robots.txt isn’t blocking AI crawlers, or you’ll be invisible in those discussions.
This revealing diagnostic paves the way for action. I’m laying out a detailed unification framework at SMX Advanced, and I’d love to see you there.
The Window Won’t Stay Open Forever
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) keyword difficulty currently floats between 15 and 20, far lower than traditional SEO terms, which can span 45 to 60. This disparity will soon narrow, as favored sources selected by LLMs end up being perpetually referenced.
Some companies are watching their search traffic nosedive, yet they are surging in actual business growth. These firms stopped isolating channels and started analyzing their customers’ comprehensive search journey.
We’re introducing our unified search strategy at SMX Advanced in our session titled “Organic, Paid, and AI Search: One Strategy to Rule Them All.” If you’re eager to blend your strategies into one cohesive plan, join our session or visit us at Booth #9.
Remember, the search experience we had in 2023 has evolved, and our strategies should too.
During a recent presentation, I was thrilled to learn about Microsoft’s latest tease regarding new AI reporting features in Bing Webmaster Tools. These updates aim to enhance the existing AI performance reports, offering fascinating insights into citation share, query intent grounding, and GEO-focused recommendations.
I stumbled upon shared screenshots from this intriguing presentation delivered by Krishna Madhavan at SEO Week in the bustling city of New York. Azeem Ahmad captured the essence of this moment, highlighting the growing transparency gap between Bing and Google.
Intriguing Details: The presentation shared several slides showcasing these promising new features. One can feel the excitement building within the SEO community as these innovations hint at a more insightful way to track AI interactions.
Bing Webmaster Tools just dropped some VERY COOL stuff at #SEOWeek 2026
Stay Tuned: While these features aren’t live just yet, catching a glimpse of them was very promising. It seems Microsoft is ramping up to offer more ways to navigate AI-driven search results.
Why This Matters: Gaining more transparency on how our content performs in AI search results is invaluable. I eagerly anticipate the day when these tools go live, promising greater clarity and control over AI interactions.
At the moment, details on the exact functionality and release timeline remain vague. I will certainly keep my eyes peeled for further updates to better understand their full potential.
As someone deeply interested in how technology shapes our interactions, I found Google’s new AI developments in search particularly fascinating. Google’s VP of Search, Liz Reid, recently delved into how AI is transforming search intent, monetization, and content visibility. In a new Bloomberg podcast, she explained how these changes are reshaping our search behavior.
Reid assured us that AI is not diminishing Search but altering its usage. AI Overviews now help filter low-value clicks while encouraging more frequent searches. Reid highlighted how AI reduces “bounce” clicks, those quick visits to a page for a single fact. It’s an interesting evolution—sometimes we only have seconds to spare, while other times, we aim to immerse ourselves for longer periods.
People Want AI and the Web Together
Reid debunked the myth that users desire AI over the web. Instead, she notes, people want AI integrated into their web experience. I see this pattern in my own browsing habits, where I might search for a quick fact one moment and dive deeply into an article the next. She emphasized that people still crave human perspectives and diverse insights.
AI Overviews: Adapting to User Needs
Liz Reid explained that AI Overviews aren’t activated for every search. Google’s strategy is user-centric, providing AI support only when it’s beneficial. This selective approach ensures we get the best possible answer for our queries. The system evolves as user behaviors change, and Google continually refines which queries deserve an AI Overview.
Changing Search Habits
It’s intriguing to note the shift in how we query Google. Searches have become longer and more conversational, moving away from terse keywords. In my own searching, I now use full sentences to express my needs, which aligns with Reid’s insights. She reiterated that users now articulate their problems more clearly, allowing Google to provide comprehensive responses.
Ads and AI: A New Dynamic
Even with AI-enhanced answers, Google can still generate revenue from Search, assuring us that the commercialization of queries largely remains unaffected. When I’m on the hunt for products, such as buying shoes, I still rely on ads to guide my purchasing decisions. Reid also highlighted that detailed queries offer potential for more targeted ads.
Monitoring User Retention
Reid highlighted that a key metric for Google is whether users return to Search more frequently. This is more than just increased search volume; it’s about building a loyal user base that turns to Google consistently because it meets their needs effectively.
AI Slop: Addressing Content Quality
Interestingly, AI hasn’t introduced new content quality issues but rather increased its volume. Reid assured us that Google’s aim is to spotlight quality content while minimizing the visibility of “slop.” It’s a challenge, but one that Google is committed to tackling by continually enhancing its ranking systems.
When I think about brand visibility today, it’s clear that being chosen by AI systems is crucial. Authority, unique insights, and consistent signals now determine if my brand makes the cut.
I’ve realized that AI isn’t just reshaping search; it’s deciding which brands are seen and which are ignored.
I learned from Andrew Warden, CMO of Semrush, at the Adobe Summit that visibility is evolving fundamentally, and our brands risk being systematically filtered out by AI systems.
“The idea of standing out is no longer optional. There’s a real risk of sameness,” he pointed out.
With AI systems deciding what to highlight and what to ignore, I know I must compete more fiercely for visibility in AI-generated answers.
AI is Changing How Discovery Works
The change is evident in the data: 60% of Google searches now end without a click to a website. People are still seeking information but aren’t always visiting websites. They’re getting their answers directly from AI systems like Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT.
These AI systems have become, as Warden described, the “new gatekeepers.”
This shift ushers us into the agentic era, where AI systems act as intermediaries, guiding users from inquiry to decision in one seamless interface.
Meanwhile, user behavior is evolving. People engage more in conversational environments, posing follow-up questions, refining queries, and surveying options within the interface, all resulting in fewer clicks but often attracting higher-intent users.
Warden noted that consumers using LLMs convert at least four times higher than those relying solely on search.
SEO is the Foundation
Despite some claims that AI could replace search, Warden reassured us that SEO is not dead.
SEO has become more foundational than ever. It’s essential to ensure my brand exists in the data layer AI systems rely on.
Warden emphasized, “SEO isn’t just for humans anymore. This is a training manual for AI right now.”
This involves ensuring:
Crawlability
Indexability
Structured data
Authority signals
Without these, my brand won’t appear at all.
Research backs this up: 94% of Google AI Overviews cite at least one top organic result, reaffirming that traditional search signals still support AI outcomes.
The Rise of the ‘Bland Tax’
One striking concept from the session was what Warden dubbed the “bland tax.”
AI conditions itself to overlook blandness, causing generic or repetitive content to vanish.
If I’m generic, Warden warned I’m perceived as average, and if I’m bland, I’m effectively invisible.
AI systems don’t reward sameness. Rather than highlighting my brand, they often condense similar content into a single, attribution-lacking response.
“This is an invisible penalty,” Warden noted.
The consequences manifest in several ways:
My brand identity gets erased in AI-generated summaries
My content is filtered out as low-value
My work becomes training data for AI without offering visibility to my brand
“You also become a free training ground for LLMs,” he said.
What Visibility Depends On
Warden redefined brand visibility as a blend of:
Discoverability: Can LLMs easily find me?
Authority: Do they trust my brand enough to include it?
“You absolutely need both,” Warden asserted.
SEO ensures I’m discoverable. Authority determines whether my brand shows up in AI-generated responses.
Without authority, I risk turning into a “commodity that isn’t worth being mentioned.”
How to Win: Three Key Signals
Warden outlined three crucial areas determining whether my brand appears or gets filtered out:
1. Entity Authority
AI systems map entities and relationships, and they must recognize my brand as an authority on a topic.
One key signal is brand demand. If people aren’t seeking out my brand, neither will AI.
Strong brands emphasize their authority across various platforms—owned content, media exposure, and community discussions—demonstrating their niche.
2. Information Density and Originality
AI systems prioritize content that offers new insights. It’s vital to not just publish content but contribute something meaningful.
They emphasize new facts with proprietary data, original research, unique perspectives, and expert insights.
According to Warden, original insights can enhance visibility by 30 to 40%.
3. Signal Alignment
AI evaluates not just what I convey but also what others say about my brand.
This includes reviews, discussions on platforms like Reddit and YouTube, media mentions, and customer conversations.
Warden warned that conflicting signals could prompt AI to flag my brand as unreliable.
Consistency across these channels creates what he called a “consensus signal” that AI systems can trust.
Why Most Organizations Aren’t Ready
One of our biggest challenges is organizational, as visibility isn’t just a channel issue; it’s an organizational one.
Currently, responsibilities are fragmented. SEO teams focus solely on rankings, PR and brand teams manage messaging, and growth teams conduct experiments. This leaves no one clearly owning AI visibility.
This fragmentation leads to inconsistent signals and missed opportunities for us.
To truly compete, we need alignment across teams, working on a shared strategy about how my brand appears wherever LLMs gather data.
The Measurement Problem
Meanwhile, traditional performance metrics are unraveling.
Many marketers, including myself, notice a gap where rankings hold steady, but traffic declines. Meanwhile, leads might increase, yet attribution remains murky.
Warden explained that demand remains, but traffic no longer serves as its proxy. Our content is utilized, but not in ways directing users back to us.
This creates a growing disparity between impact and the ability to measure that impact accurately.
From Rankings to Relevance
The nature of competition has evolved. I’m no longer vying for a mere position; instead, I’m competing to be featured in a synthesized AI answer.
Authority, once easier to influence, now hinges on external validation—emphasizing what others say over what I publish.
Algorithms have shifted from being my allies to arbiters of meaning, marking a significant change in search dynamics since Google itself emerged.
The New Rules of Brand Visibility
AI has not altered what makes a brand strong but has transformed how that strength is measured and rewarded. The brands that win today will build real authority in a focused niche, publish original and high-value content, and ensure consistent messaging across every platform.
The need for consistent third-party validation across an ecosystem is paramount.
As Warden urged, I must make it impossible for LLMs to ignore my brand.
When I’m faced with the challenge of optimizing for keywords that I can’t explicitly use, I gear up with a strategic mindset. Legal constraints, brand guidelines, or public perceptions might put certain terms off-limits, but there are effective ways to capture demand without using them directly.
Here’s my approach to overcoming this hurdle, aligning with search behaviors, and enhancing visibility despite limitations.
When Certain Keywords Are Off-Limits
In the world of SEO, it’s not uncommon to hear, “We want to rank for (insert competitive term),” followed by, “Avoid using (that exact term) in content.”
My journey began over 10 years ago, tasked with ranking for “custom koozies.” This sparked endless debates on the correct nomenclature for these drink holders. At home, we referred to them as “coolie cups,” but data revealed that most people simply called them “koozies.” However, “Koozie®” being a trademark meant we had to cleverly position ourselves at the top without relying on that term as our primary focus.
Years later, at a marketing agency focusing on senior living, I encountered new terminology like assisted and independent living. Despite a bias against the term “nursing home” due to negative connotations, our research showed it was still widely used, presenting similar challenges to what I had faced before.
Strategies for Ranking Without Using Specific Keywords
Even if I can’t use a keyword, by sending the correct signals through related terms and creative strategies, I can still rank effectively. Here’s how:
1. Pull the Data and Confirm Direction
Sometimes, showcasing data alone can shift perspectives. Sharing insights like “skilled nursing near me” having 4,400 monthly searches compared to “nursing home near me” with 27,100 searches can be eye-opening. Understanding the local search volume is crucial in determining the best strategy.
2. Surround the Terms
Creating contextual relevance is essential. For example, around the term “Koozies,” I include words like “beer,” “drink,” and occasions such as “bachelorette party.” These help build search engine context.
3. Use Synonyms and Break Down Phrases
Utilizing synonyms or splitting phrases works well. Instead of “Koozies,” I might say “cozies” or “coolies,” and for “nursing homes,” highlighting “nursing” and “home” separately enriches content.
4. Employ Indirect Usage
Referring indirectly can be impactful, such as using headers like “More than a nursing home” or integrating the terms into questions or statements naturally within the content.
5. Incorporate Unnameable Products
Incorporating trademarked items alongside other products allowed me to use the term “Can Coolers & Koozies” even when the latter couldn’t be the focal point.
6. Craft Creative Anchor Text
Using the primary term in both off-site and internal links can guide search engines effectively. Controlling anchor text is key.
7. Optimize Non-Visible Elements
Leveraging alt text and strategically placing terms in title tags ensures that search engines get the right signals without visible usage, balancing between being search-friendly and on-brand.
8. Add Definitions
Adding definitions helps clarify common terms related to your offerings, boosting SEO and enhancing your site’s authority.
Always consult with legal advisors regarding trademarked terms. By gathering data, crafting strategic approaches, and adjusting tactics as necessary, you can achieve SEO success even with restrictions.
I’ve recently discovered that Google’s latest update to Chrome now offers an ingenious AI Mode, designed to make my browsing experience more streamlined and efficient. With this new enhancement, I can dive deeper into searches with fewer tabs, making my workflow smoother than ever before.
What’s new? Let me walk you through the three exciting features in Chrome’s AI Mode. First up is the ability to search side-by-side. Now, when I click on a link in AI Mode on my desktop, the related webpage opens right next to it. This setup allows me to easily compare details, visit relevant sites, and ask follow-up questions without losing the context of my search. Here’s how it looks:
Another fantastic addition is the ability to search across my tabs. Whether on desktop or mobile, I can now tap the new “plus” menu on the New Tab page or within AI Mode to incorporate recent tabs into my search. This feature helps AI Mode provide more customized responses and suggest additional sites worth exploring.
Lastly, there’s the multi-input and easy tool access feature. I can mix and match various tabs, images, or files such as PDFs, and bring that context directly into AI Mode. Plus, tools like Canvas and image creation are readily accessible wherever I see the new plus menu in Chrome.
Understanding why this matters to us as users is crucial. These Chrome-specific features launched initially for U.S. English users unlock greater AI Mode capabilities. While currently limited to Chrome users, they clearly indicate Google’s forward-thinking direction in AI integration.
As someone who’s been closely observing AI advancements, I found Google’s AI Overviews to have improved significantly. By February, they correctly answered standard factual benchmarks 91% of the time, a notable rise from 85% back in October. This assessment came from a rigorous analysis conducted by The New York Times in collaboration with the AI startup, Oumi.
Yet, considering Google processes more than 5 trillion searches annually, this still implies that millions of answers could be incorrect every hour. In essence, there’s much room for improvement.
Why it matters to me. My interactions with Google have evolved from just link clicks to encountering AI-generated summaries. This evolution suggests that while AI Overviews have gotten better, they still mix accurate responses with poor sourcing and blatant errors, potentially misleading searchers and affecting visibility for many publishers.
The nitty-gritty details. Oumi put 4,326 Google searches to the test using SimpleQA, a benchmark known for measuring factual precision in AI systems. AI Overviews hit a 91% accuracy rate post-upgrade to Gemini 3 from Gemini 2’s 85%.
The more pressing issue for me is the sourcing. Oumi discovered that more than half of February’s correct responses were ‘ungrounded,’ meaning the linked references didn’t fully back the answers.
This lack of grounding makes verification a challenge. Even if the answer is correct, the linked pages might not sufficiently illustrate the reasoning.
What shifted. While the accuracy saw improvements from October to February, grounding declined. In October, 37% of accurate answers were ungrounded; by February, this figure increased to 56%.
Real-world examples. The Times pointed out several inaccuracies: For instance, Google incorrectly dated when Bob Marley’s home became a museum. Google’s answer was 1987, but the actual year was 1986, and the cited sources conflicted. A search about Yo-Yo Ma and the Classical Music Hall of Fame yielded a link to the Hall’s site, yet Google stated he wasn’t inducted. Moreover, while Google got Dick Drago’s age at death right, it flubbed his date of death.
Google’s standpoint: Google contested the Times’ findings, arguing that the benchmark used in the study was flawed and didn’t mirror actual search behavior. Google spokesperson Ned Adriance mentioned that the study had some ‘serious holes.’
Furthermore, Google asserted that its AI Overviews utilize search ranking and safety measures to minimize spam and has consistently cautioned that AI responses might contain errors.
I just found out that Google has officially rolled out its much-anticipated March 2026 core update. This marks the inaugural core update of 2026, closely following the recent March 2026 spam update and February 2026 Discover update.
Google made the announcement today, confirming the start of the rollout. They mentioned this process could stretch out over two weeks. I find it fascinating how these updates play a pivotal role in shaping search algorithms and ultimately influence how content is surfaced on Google.
What Google is saying. In an update on their Search Status Dashboard, Google stated: “Released the March 2026 core update. The rollout may take up to 2 weeks to complete.” They also took to LinkedIn to emphasize that this is a regular update focused on showcasing relevant and satisfying content for searchers across various sites, reiterating the two-week completion window.
About core updates. Google’s core updates happen several times annually and bring broad alterations to search algorithms and systems. While we expect some updates, they surprised us by adding some smaller, unannounced changes. The anticipation of frequent updates didn’t quite pan out as we thought.
What to do if you are hit. If your site takes a hit from this core update, Google hasn’t provided any new guidance, but in previous instances, they’ve advised us to focus on creating helpful content. They stress there’s no specific action to swiftly rectify any negative impact; however, recovery could occur gradually with subsequent core updates.
In summary, Google’s enduring guidance remains: create content for people, not just search engines. There’s nothing extraordinary creators need to do for this update as long as they provide gratifying content meant for users. If rankings slip, Google encourages looking through their helpful content guidelines.
For comprehensive details about Google’s core updates, Google’s technical documentation provides in-depth information.
Previous core updates. Let’s have a quick glance at some recent core updates. The December 2025 update began on December 11 and wrapped up by December 29. Similarly, the June 2025 update ran from June 30 to July 17. It’s intriguing to see these timelines and their impact on content visibility across Google’s domain.
Why we care. Every core update brings a ripple effect to Google’s search results and rankings. I view these updates as opportunities—some of us might see a beneficial shift in rankings and search visibility, while others may need to adapt to new fluctuations. I sincerely hope this update benefits your efforts, boosting both traffic and conversions.
