Skip to content

Features
Pricing
Changelog
Status

Tag: Compliance

Why Accessibility Is an $18 Trillion Marketing Advantage

Every so often, I see a product launch turn into a marketing lesson bigger than the product itself. Selena Gomez’s Rare Beauty did that with a new fragrance, but it was not only the scent that drew attention. The bottle became the story. Its accessible, easy-to-use packaging sparked conversation, earned praise from accessibility advocates, and reminded me how powerful inclusive design can be when it is built into the product from the start.

For me, the lesson is clear: accessibility is not a side note. It can become the campaign. One thoughtful design choice created cultural impact that would be hard to buy with media spend alone. It also showed why accessibility can build loyalty, strengthen brand reputation, support compliance, and drive measurable growth.

Accessibility as a campaign strategy

I do not see Rare Beauty’s accessibility work as a one-off moment. From packaging to pricing to its ongoing mental health advocacy, the brand has consistently made inclusivity part of its identity. That matters because consumers can usually tell when a brand is chasing attention versus when it is acting from a real strategy. They reward brands that lead with values and follow through.

Rare Beauty is not alone. I see leading brands across industries using accessibility as a differentiator, not a footnote. Apple often frames accessibility features as part of product innovation. Microsoft has brought inclusive design into mainstream campaigns, including adaptive gaming products that positioned accessibility as a source of creativity and connection. In fashion and retail, brands like Tommy Hilfiger and Unilever have put adaptive design into product launches and brand identity instead of treating it as a niche offering.

Studies from Edelman and McKinsey show why this shift matters. According to those studies, 73% of Gen Z choose to buy from brands they believe in, and 70% say they try to purchase products from companies they consider ethical. I do not see those as fringe preferences. I see them as mainstream expectations that should change how marketers build trust and growth.

The $18 trillion market marketers overlook

More than 1.3 billion people globally live with a disability. Together with their friends and family, they control more than $18 trillion in spending power, according to the Return on Disability Group. I believe marketers should view this as more than a compliance issue. It is a growth opportunity, a reputation opportunity, and a trust-building opportunity with one of the world’s largest and most passionate consumer groups.

That passion often turns into advocacy. In discussions with AudioEye’s A11iance Team, a group of individuals with disabilities who regularly share feedback on real-world accessibility experiences, one member said, “If I find a website that works and works very well for me, I will always recommend it to friends and family because I want people to have the same experience that I have.”

Another A11iance Team member, Maxwell Ivey, put it this way: “The cheapest form of advertising is word of mouth, and people with disabilities can have some of the loudest voices when we find people willing to make the effort. Because it’s that sincere effort over time that really counts with us.”

When accessibility becomes part of the customer experience, I see it create something media budgets cannot easily buy: trust and loyalty that scale through advocacy. But the reverse is also true. In a survey of assistive technology users, 54% said they do not feel eCommerce companies care about earning their business.

That should get every marketer’s attention. Too many brands are still fighting for the same crowded audience segments while overlooking a major opportunity in plain sight. When they do, they leave loyalty, advocacy, and revenue on the table.

Here is where I see many brands stumble: accessibility often stops at the shelf. Marketers invest heavily in packaging, store displays, and product design, while digital experiences lag behind. Yet those digital experiences are often the first and most important touchpoints customers have with a brand.

As accessibility-led design earns more attention, loyalty, and earned media, the gap between physical product innovation and digital experience becomes harder to ignore.

AudioEye’s 2025 Digital Accessibility Index found an average of 297 accessibility issues per web page detectable by automation alone. Each issue can create friction in the customer journey, cost a conversion, or introduce compliance risk under frameworks such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the European Accessibility Act (EAA).

I would not launch a campaign without a brand review or a legal check. In the same way, I do not think any digital touchpoint should go live without an accessibility review.

Four moves marketing leaders can make

Too often, I see accessibility treated as a risk to manage instead of an advantage to use. The marketers who gain ground will be the ones who change that mindset. I would start with four practical moves.

1. Make accessibility your campaign hook

I would not hide accessibility in the fine print. I would lead with it. Brands like Rare Beauty have shown that inclusive design is the story. Build campaigns where accessibility is not an afterthought, but the differentiator that earns attention and loyalty.

2. Bake it into your brand system

Accessibility should not sit off to the side. I would make Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) alignment part of the brand system, right alongside typography, logos, and tone of voice. When accessibility is documented and expected, it becomes easier to apply across every campaign.

3. Use data as your proof point

Marketers are storytellers, but numbers strengthen the story. I would track accessibility improvements such as fewer user-reported barriers, higher accessibility scores, stronger alt text, better color contrast, and more usable forms. Then I would connect those metrics to business outcomes like conversion, reach, and sentiment to show how accessibility drives ROI, not just compliance.

4. Protect accessibility like brand safety

I would treat accessibility with the same seriousness as brand safety. Every update, seasonal campaign, and product drop should be monitored for accessibility. Trust and reputation are too valuable to leave exposed.

The competitive advantage

Rare Beauty’s fragrance launch proved something important to me: when a brand leads with accessibility, the story can write itself. Loyalty builds more authentically, and momentum feels more natural because the value is real.

The larger opportunity is that many brands still do not see it. They continue to treat accessibility as a compliance checkbox when it can be a growth strategy.

For marketers, that is the wake-up call. Accessibility builds loyalty. It strengthens brand reputation. It supports compliance. And it can drive measurable growth across marketing efforts.

Rare Beauty showed how accessibility can capture attention at the shelf. Now I see the next opportunity clearly: making sure that same accessibility carries through online. When every touchpoint welcomes everyone, every campaign has a better chance to deliver its full impact.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.

July 3, 2026
Medical PPC Ads: My Guide to Safer, Stronger Results

PPC advertising for medical and mental health services comes with more restrictions than many other industries, but I still see it as one of the most effective ways to keep a steady flow of new patients and clients coming into a practice.

Whether I am managing campaigns for a client, promoting my own practice, or building a campaign from scratch, I focus on the same fundamentals: the right keywords, compliant messaging, clear landing pages, and lead-quality tracking.

Choosing keywords for medical and mental health advertising

When I choose keywords for medical or mental health advertising, I start by thinking about how real patients search. In most cases, their searches fall into three main groups.

First, some people search by symptoms or treatment options. They may not know which professional they need yet, so they search for phrases like “treatment options for depression” or “why does my ankle hurt when I run.” I do not ignore these searches, because they can still turn into new patients or clients.

Second, people often search for what they think the service is called. They may use simplified or incorrect terms, such as “therapist to manage bipolar medications” or “foot pain doctor.” These searches still show intent, even if the language is not medically precise.

Third, some searchers use the correct term because they already know what they need and are ready to contact a professional. They may search for “psychiatrist” or “endodontist near me.” Even then, I watch for confusion between similar roles, such as therapist, psychologist, and counselor.

Most of my budget usually goes toward the second and third groups, where searchers are closer to taking action and starting treatment.

If I have a larger budget, I may also test broader symptom-based or informational searches that could convert later. These can work, but I treat them carefully because informational searchers may or may not be ready to book.

I also rely heavily on negative keywords. They help me block searches for services the practice does not provide, which protects the budget and improves lead quality.

Dig deeper: A guide to Google Ads for regulated and sensitive categories

Staying compliant with ad copy

With medical and mental health ad copy, I have to be careful. I need the ad to make it clear that help is available, but I cannot write in a way that feels too direct, too personal, or too aggressive.

I expect some trial and error. An ad rejection does not automatically mean an account is in trouble. It usually means the ad was not approved, so I adjust the wording or request a manual review when appropriate.

Blunt language is often where problems happen. Instead of making strong claims, I test softer, more compliant language that still communicates the value of the service.

To stand out from competitors, I focus on practical benefits such as accepted insurance, payment options, specialized treatments, or distinctions like being family-owned, local, award-winning, certified, or licensed.

I avoid terms like “cure” and other language that implies guaranteed results. Google and Meta both have ad policies that restrict how medical, mental health, and wellness services can be promoted.

When an ad gets rejected, I rewrite it so it still explains the value of the practice without crossing policy lines.

For some psychiatrists, doctors, and other medical service providers, Google Ads may also require a LegitScript.com listing, especially for addiction treatment services.

Google Ads support or its documentation will explain whether that requirement applies to a specific practice.

Building effective landing pages

When I build landing or service pages, I start with the information the front office already gives to patients. That is often the clearest and most useful material available.

I pull details from pamphlets, office materials, and common intake conversations. Then I highlight key points such as accepted insurance, cash payment options, payment plans, financing, and specialized treatments.

I also answer the questions patients regularly ask in person or over the phone. A strong landing page should keep improving as new questions come up.

Those questions might include whether the practice works with children, accepts Medicare, offers phone or virtual sessions, or provides a specific treatment.

I make the next step obvious. That may mean booking an appointment, scheduling an initial consultation, requesting a free phone consultation, filling out a form or questionnaire, submitting a contact request, or calling with questions.

I avoid vague forms and generic phone numbers with no instructions. Instead, I explain the process clearly from pre-treatment to treatment to post-treatment.

I also like to include a FAQ section that answers questions such as “what is the process?” and “how does treatment work?” The more uncertainty I remove, the easier it is for a patient or client to take action.

Choosing the best campaign types

For medical and mental health services, I usually build the strategy around Search campaigns.

Automated or audience-based campaign types, including Performance Max and Demand Gen, can run into privacy and targeting limits. Depending on the service, the ads may not be approved.

Remarketing is typically restricted for the same reason. Video campaigns may be possible, but targeting limits often make them better suited for local branding than direct response.

Search campaigns work well because people are actively looking for answers, treatment, or a specific type of provider. They are typing in the exact services they need.

Many providers also use directories like Psychology Today or ZocDoc for lead generation. I still like supplementing those channels with Google or Microsoft Search campaigns because they send traffic directly to the practice’s own site and give more control over patient or client flow.

My usual approach is to target very specific terms for people who are ready to hire a professional, then test broader symptom or research-related terms when the budget allows.

Meta Ads can also be useful, but privacy laws limit targeting. I also have to be careful with ad copy, images, and landing pages so the campaign stays compliant.

I review Meta’s ad policies before launching campaigns to reduce avoidable disapprovals. Meta can support larger budgets, but for most medical and mental health marketing, Google Search remains the most reliable starting point.

Dig deeper: How to prevent Meta Ads restrictions on health and wellness campaigns

Tracking lead quality

With any online advertising, and especially with medical and mental health services, I need to know more than how many leads came in. I need to know which leads became real patients or clients.

A simple CRM, whether generic or built for the industry, can track incoming leads and show which ones converted.

Google Ads, Microsoft Ads, and Meta Ads all offer built-in CRM connections. I can also use a tool like Zapier to connect systems without needing a programmer.

Beyond website form submissions, I also track inbound calls generated by marketing campaigns. Phone calls often represent high-intent leads, so leaving them out can distort ROI.

Call tracking tools such as CallTrackingMetrics, CallRail, and WhatConverts can integrate with CRMs and major ad platforms to measure lead quality.

They also offer call recording and are HIPAA-compliant, which matters when tracking performance in healthcare-related campaigns.

Keeping medical and mental health ads effective

To keep medical and mental health ads effective, I focus on four things: targeting the right searches, writing compliant ads, improving landing pages, and tracking lead quality.

When those pieces work together, I can build campaigns that attract the right patients and clients more consistently.

A steady, well-structured approach is what helps a practice maintain or expand its patient flow without creating unnecessary compliance risk.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.

July 3, 2026
Profound HIPAA Compliance Unlocks Healthcare AEO

I’m excited to share that Profound has successfully completed an independent HIPAA compliance assessment conducted by Sensiba LLP.

For me, this is an important step forward for healthcare, pharmaceutical, and life sciences organizations that want to adopt Answer Engine Optimization without compromising regulatory requirements.

With this assessment complete, I can now support organizations in using AEO more confidently while maintaining the compliance standards that matter most in regulated healthcare environments.

Inspired by this post on Try Profound Blog.

July 3, 2026
Google’s Verification Push: New Rules for EU Financial Ads

I’m excited to share that Google is expanding its financial services ad verification across 24 European countries. As of this summer, financial advertisers in these markets will face new compliance checks to continue running ads in the European Economic Area (EEA).

Here’s the scoop: Starting July 23rd, Google’s new requirements for financial services advertisers apply to 24 EEA countries, including Austria, Belgium, and Sweden, among others.

As advertisers in designated financial categories, we must undergo verification when prompted by Google. This initiative targets financial fraud and aims to ensure ads are from genuine and regulated providers.

Why it matters: If I don’t complete this verification process, my ads may no longer run in these markets. This policy impacts not just banks and insurers but also the agencies that manage their campaigns.

The big picture: This is part of Google’s efforts to improve transparency and protect consumers. If notified, I’ll receive alerts on the Google platform indicating that ad performance could be impacted unless verification is completed.

Failing to comply means I might lose the ability to serve financial services ads in these countries. It’s crucial for continued campaign success.

How does verification work? I need to complete two steps: First, I’ll verify through G2, a third-party compliance partner. Next, I’ll submit Google’s financial verification application using a code from G2.

During this process, I’ll provide details about the services offered, regulatory status, and necessary evidence of authorization or exemption from a relevant financial regulator.

Agencies, beware: These requirements also apply to agencies like mine managing campaigns for financial services clients. We’ll need to pass compliance checks before continuing operations.

A key point to note: Third-party advertisers don’t have the same freedom. If I promote services approved by a verified institution but lack direct authorization, I must rely on them to submit verification requests on my behalf.

Depending on the financial services being promoted, such as banking or credit products, I might need to undergo this verification. Google can update its list at any time, so staying informed is crucial.

Stay vigilant: As a financial brand targeting European customers, I must ensure compliance now to avoid disruptions later. This could affect agencies handling multiple clients due to administrative demands.

Dig deeper: For more details on the new requirements, I can visit Google’s support page.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.

June 23, 2026
Preventing Google Penalties: The Costly Truth of Recovery
Recovering from a manual action is no quick fix; it can take months of rigorous cleanup and multiple reviews. I’ve learned that regular compliance audits are key to avoiding a crisis altogether.

Google penalties—or manual spam actions—are those unpredictable disruptions that can shake up a thriving online business overnight.

For businesses like mine that rely heavily on organic traffic, the impact is quite severe. It goes beyond just losing rankings; revenue takes a hit, customer acquisition costs spike, expansion plans are halted, and the effects linger long after the policy issues have been addressed.

With Google’s consistent 90% market share, it remains my main source of traffic, much like it is for many publishers, e-commerce platforms, and lead generation companies.

Unfortunately, direct traffic seldom makes up for significant visibility losses, and Bing isn’t enough to fill the gap. This means a manual spam action is not just an SEO risk but a grave operational concern.

Manual Actions Aren’t Algorithm Updates

It’s essential for me to clarify that manual spam actions and algorithmic updates are two different beasts. Manual penalties result from specific violations identified against Google Search Essentials and demand entirely different responses.

Manual actions involve considerable internal review at Google. When violations are suspected and verified, these actions are taken, because proven policy breaches aren’t taken lightly by Google.

The real issue lies in recognizing accumulated policy violations over time, something I’ve seen many businesses fail to address adequately.

How Penalties Develop

The journey to a manual penalty often begins in non-obvious ways, with compliance erosion happening gradually.
- An e-commerce company might start with aggressive link-building strategies that accumulate unchecked spam links over the years.
- A publisher engages in commercial partnerships involving sponsored content, integrating these into their main site structure.
- A SaaS business expands into new markets with low-quality location pages.
- Lead generation companies scale supplemental SEO content without thorough editorial oversight, simply adhering to industry standards.
Though these tactics might initially boost visibility and revenue, they often fall out of line with Google’s quality standards over time.

Why Historical Violations Still Matter

Manual spam actions are disruptive partly because old policy violations can persist without being flagged for years. Google doesn’t forget historical footprints in its search system, meaning unresolved past SEO practices can become today’s liabilities.

Practices like paid placements, commercial guest posting, or directory spam from years ago can remain risks until they’re addressed, creating vulnerabilities that must not be ignored.

Reputation Abuse and Publisher Liability

When a trustworthy brand allows unsupervised content from third parties, the site’s credibility might suffer. Once a manual spam action hits, the entire site can lose visibility—even the genuinely valuable sections suffer.

Recovery from such penalties is not simple or cheap. It often demands structural changes and more stringent editorial and technical controls, as I can attest from my own experiences.

The Risks of Scaled Content

Google is now more vigilant about large-scale publishing systems that lack originality and value. I’m aware of how easily businesses, unintentionally, slide into creating repetitive, low-value content.
- Affiliate networks proliferating nearly identical comparison pages.
- Local SEO operations using cookie-cutter service pages across numerous regions.
- AI-driven workflows publishing large amounts of unfounded information.
- Mass-produced travel destination content lacking unique insights.
Most businesses don’t cross these lines deliberately. However, without ongoing reviews and updates, significant issues can fester under the radar.

Compliance Requires Ongoing Oversight

For me, regular compliance reviews are non-negotiable. It takes external expertise to assess true compliance comprehensively. Even powerful internal SEO teams can miss potential exposure points if left unchecked.

I’ve found that organizations integrating compliance into governance see considerable advantages. Regular audits and assessments can preempt violations and protect critical search traffic, especially during pivotal business moments.

In essence, prevention through regular audits is a more efficient and less painful approach than dealing with recovery after a penalty.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.
June 16, 2026
Google’s July Update: Transforming Local Services Ads for Clarity

I’m intrigued by Google’s decision to update its Local Services Ads on July 6. This change isn’t just a simple update—they’re renaming policies as “requirements” and aligning everything with a recent badge system overhaul.

So, what’s going on? Google is working to refine the rules governing Local Services Ads. They’re not just updating the language; they’re also aligning advertiser requirements with their new verification standards.

One key change is the renaming of “Local Services platform policies” to “Local Services Ads requirements.” It might sound administrative, but these adjustments suggest a more straightforward way for businesses to comply and earn those coveted Google Guarantee badges.

For those of us in advertising, these updates are vital. They not only promise clarity but hint at the possibility that compliance will tie directly to badge status. Agencies and local businesses must stay vigilant and ensure their credentials and standards are spot-on.

What does this mean in the grand scheme of things? Google aims to make the advertiser requirements crystal clear, aligning them with the new badge framework while simplifying the guidance on compliance.

To be clear, Google isn’t cracking down hard on policy. Instead, they’re focused on clarity and modernization, simplifying how businesses access these requirements.

In summary, Google is refreshing its Local Services Ads policies. The shift is towards “requirements,” backed by a badge-driven approach, enhancing trust and eligibility for businesses.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.

June 8, 2026
Navigating AI Legal Risks: Safeguard Your Business with Ease

As I delve into the world of artificial intelligence, I’ve been stunned by the numerous legal risks that businesses face, including those related to copyright, privacy, misinformation, and compliance. While AI is still growing, the risks are growing rapidly with it.

The legal landscape is changing, especially with Europe leading the charge through the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. In the US, almost 20 states have enacted AI-related legislation. Yet, the federal government’s stance on keeping regulations light is evident in the AI policy wishlist from the White House.

Despite the pace at which new regulations appear, AI isn’t reshaping the legal landscape; it’s accelerating it. Risks often trace back to known legal domains such as intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, and liability.

So rather than considering ‘AI law’ as something entirely novel, it’s more beneficial for me to identify where familiar legal risks stem from within business operations.

I learned that AI risks are prominently apparent in nine business areas. Addressing them doesn’t require legal expertise, just keen questioning to address each concern effectively.

Let me walk you through these areas:

1. Intellectual Property
The key question here is: Who owns the work, and are we unknowingly using someone else’s intellectual property?

In AI, ownership is still being defined. However, the U.S. Copyright Office indicates that works purely generated by AI are not protected. Human creativity must play a significant role in shaping AI’s outputs for potential protection.

Using patented ideas conceived by humans but developed with AI remains in question as per the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s revised guidelines. These questions aren’t theoretical; they highlight real, current challenges organizations face.

Emerging case filings, such as The New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI, showcase the ever-growing concern over infringement risks.

Two primary risks stand out: unintentional incorporation of protected material in AI outputs and proving ownership without sufficient human creativity involved. In content creation, human involvement isn’t a luxury; it’s an absolute necessity.

2. Advertising and Misinformation
The pivotal question I consider is: What message are we crafting, and is it accurate?

AI tools empower us to create vast amounts of content, which is advantageous. However, the risk of distributing misleading or incorrect information exists. I witnessed Google Bard’s numerous errors during a product demo, which negatively impacted its market value by $100 billion.

The emergence of hallucinated data, fabricated citations, and flawed reasoning are challenges businesses face when publishing under their brand. I understand that a single error can severely damage reputation.

3. Privacy and Personal Data
The question guiding me is: Are we handling people’s data lawfully, transparently, and respectfully?

Consumer expectations on data privacy have significantly shifted. Legal frameworks like the EU’s GDPR, Canada’s PIPEDA, and California’s CCPA set new standards for collecting, using, and disclosing personal data.

We’ve seen how regulators treat these matters seriously; Italy blocked ChatGPT over privacy issues. Clear policies on data handling are crucial for any organization, and swift communication is required when a customer inquires under prevailing laws.

As I continue exploring AI’s implications on business, these areas underscore the necessity of thoughtful and deliberate strategies to manage AI’s legal implications effectively.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.

May 11, 2026
Mastering Google AI Max: New Controls and Exciting Expansions

I’ve recently explored fascinating updates in the world of Google AI Max, and I’m thrilled to share how these changes are reshaping online advertising

Google is significantly expanding AI Max across more campaigns, offering advertisers like us enhanced control over AI-driven targeting and messaging. This comes just as user search behaviors are leaning more towards conversational queries.

What’s new?

AI Max Expansion: It’s exciting to see AI Max moving beyond just Search, now rolling out to Shopping campaigns and travel-specific formats. This broadens the reach across various advertiser types.

Introducing AI Brief (Powered by Gemini): A remarkable new interface is here, allowing advertisers like us to guide AI using natural language inputs, providing an unprecedented level of control.

Compliance Features: Text disclaimers paired with URL automation help us stay compliant while leveraging automated landing page selection.

Why it Matters: AI Max is not just adding automation; it’s becoming a foundational aspect across Search, Shopping, and Travel. This means automation is increasingly key in matching ads to user intent, capturing demand earlier in the customer’s journey.

The AI Brief and other compliance features empower us with more control, ensuring our campaigns don’t feel like a “black box.”

Smarter Shopping: By using Merchant Center data, AI Max for Shopping creates adaptive ads that respond to long-tail and exploratory queries, helping brands appear earlier in the discovery phase.

Travel Consolidation: For travel advertisers, the consolidated Search Campaigns for Travel simplify operations by bringing fragmented formats together, reducing complexity with AI Max capabilities.

More Control: AI Brief addresses a major concern: compliance control in automated systems. I can define messaging rules and prioritize queries, ensuring feedback before campaigns launch.

Automation Meets Compliance: The final URL expansion uses AI for optimal landing page relevancy, while new text disclaimer features keep legal messaging intact, making AI viable in regulated sectors.

The Bottom Line: AI Max is transitioning from a search add-on to a core Google Ads component, blending automation with advertiser input to suit an AI-driven search landscape.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.

April 30, 2026
Mastering Healthcare Reviews: Stay Compliant and Dominate Local SEO
I’ve spent a lot of time understanding how online reviews, especially Google reviews, are essential for businesses that depend on local clients. It’s more than just gathering feedback; it’s a strategic move to enhance visibility and credibility.

A recent Whitespark survey revealed that four of the top 15 factors influencing Google Maps rankings are linked to reviews, including their quantity, quality, recency, and consistency. More than 80% of consumers rely on Google reviews to make judgments about local businesses, according to other studies.

For typical businesses, collecting and responding to reviews might seem simple. But working within healthcare, I know firsthand the complexity due to ethical standards and federal regulations. By navigating these challenges, you can still position yourself as a leader without breaking the rules.

Having been in the healthcare domain for over a decade, I’m excited to share the obstacles I’ve encountered and the innovative solutions I’ve discovered.

The Catch-22 in Mental Health

At one point, I helped a therapist’s private practice improve their local SEO. I noticed he had only a couple of reviews and suggested he should get more. It was then I learned, according to the American Psychological Association’s code of ethics, therapists aren’t permitted to solicit testimonials from clients, as it risks exerting undue influence.

This ethical guideline understandably impacts review numbers, but online visibility in Google remains crucial for mental health professionals. Those adhering to these rules often have less visibility, which doesn’t seem fair.

But there’s hope! You can still collect reviews creatively and ethically.

A Case Study in Mental Healthcare Reviews

When a new competitor overshadowed an addiction treatment center I was working with, I realized we had to strategize to compete without crossing ethical lines. The goal was to secure 50 to 100 reviews while maintaining at least one review per week.

The Solution

We decided the alumni, particularly those not in active treatment, could be asked for reviews by non-clinical staff. Building an alumni program helped improve experiences and gave us a new avenue for review requests.
- Assigned the task of generating reviews to an alumni coordinator, making it part of their job without incentivizing based on quantity.
- Created an online alumni group and used QR codes to stay in touch and ease access to review links.
- Leveraged verbal commitments by sending direct review links via text, streamlining the process.
The Result

Within a year, more than 100 new reviews were added, and the rating improved from 4.6 to 4.8. This surpassed the competitor and dovetailed into 500 total reviews by February 2026—all ethically and efficiently.

If you’re considering a similar strategy, remember to:
- Designate a non-clinical staff member for review management.
- Trigger review requests through alumni interactions.
- Use person-to-person and digital methods to solicit reviews.
- Monitor and discuss progress when necessary.
Review Replies and HIPAA Compliance

Responding to reviews while maintaining HIPAA compliance is just as crucial. Even acknowledging a reviewer as a patient can risk breaching patient confidentiality.

In your responses, focus on policies or encourage offline discussions without acknowledging if they were your patient. For example, use phrases like:
- “Due to privacy laws, we can’t confirm any individual as a patient. But we value your feedback and welcome direct discussions about policies or practices.”
- “Thank you for your feedback. We appreciate you taking the time to write a positive review.”
Reporting Reviews and HIPAA Compliance

While you might want to report misleading reviews, be careful not to disclose patient status to Google. Focus on misinformation or explicit violations of Google’s review policies instead.

For example, if a review falsely claims unsafe practices about an FDA-approved medication, highlight this point to Google without discussing patient relationships.
- Emphasize evidence against offensive content, PII, or other unrelated and repetitive reviews.
Keep your submissions focused by identifying the correct policy category and providing compelling evidence without alluding to the relationship between the reviewer and the facility.

Building a Compliant and Effective Review Engine in Healthcare

Navigating the complexities of healthcare review management doesn’t mean compromising on compliance or local SEO success. Create a structured and compliant process to secure continuous and genuine feedback while respecting all ethical guidelines. That way, local visibility will improve, patient privacy will be protected, and the review system will remain sustainable in the long term.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.
April 10, 2026
EU’s Verdict on Google’s Compliance: A Game Changer for Digital Markets

I’ve been eagerly anticipating the European Union’s decision on whether Google is violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA), and I sense this ruling is just around the corner. While Competition Commissioner Teresa Ribera hasn’t specified an exact date, she assures us that a decision is imminent.

What She Said: “It will come,” Ribera mentioned to Dow Jones Newswires, emphasizing the complexity of these cases. She reinforced the EU’s commitment to fair procedures and evidence-based decisions.

The Context: This all began in March 2024, when the European Commission started investigating Google’s search business under the DMA. Although fines have already been imposed on Meta and Apple, Google’s case is still pending after almost two years.

The Mounting Pressure: Recently, 18 lobby groups and civil society organizations wrote to Ribera, urging a substantial fine and definitive remedies to ensure non-compliance isn’t profitable. They stressed that Google’s dominant 90% share in the EU search market is a cause for concern.

“Every day without a decision is a day that European businesses are systematically disadvantaged,” their letter cautioned.

Why This Matters to Us: A decision against Google could fundamentally alter how its search business operates in Europe. This might change the dynamics of ad serving, ranking, and pricing, potentially impacting campaign performance and competition across the board. For those of us with European audiences, staying informed is crucial as outcomes here could have a global impact on Google’s advertising ecosystem.

Meanwhile, This Week: Ribera is in California, meeting with tech leaders like Sundar Pichai and Mark Zuckerberg, before heading to Washington D.C. for discussions with the U.S. Justice Department’s antitrust division.

The Bigger Picture: Google isn’t the only tech giant under scrutiny. The commission is also looking into how Google uses AI Overviews and ranks news publishers. Additionally, they are investigating Meta for potential restrictions on rival chatbots using WhatsApp’s business software.

The Bottom Line: Although the EU has been slow to act against Google, mounting political and public pressure is undeniable. This impending decision might set a significant precedent for enforcing the Digital Markets Act more broadly.

Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.

March 23, 2026

1 2