AI is revolutionizing how we discover, search, and purchase—it’s all happening at lightning speed. If we can’t clearly articulate the problem our brand solves, AI won’t be able to either.
I’ve noticed that customer journeys are now condensed into a single decision-making instance. David Edelman describes this as a blending of behaviors that traditionally occurred separately.
As decisions become more instant, it’s essential that I clarify what my brand can solve for the customer. Yet, too often, I find myself increasing activity rather than honing the strategy behind it.
Edelman, in his March 2026 Think with Google essay, emphasizes the rapid blending of streaming, scrolling, searching, and shopping behaviors, propelled by generative AI.
This insight shows that the traditional linear journey from awareness to purchase is outdated. Now, users multitask across platforms, fluidly moving between entertainment and intent.
The realization hit home when I learned people are using AI search engines to pose complex, emotionally rich queries, expressing context and urgency rather than just keywords.
AI processes these queries, breaking them into multiple streams and quickly synthesis results—a task that once required numerous browser tabs and hours is now done in seconds.
From this, I understand two things:
- The competition now revolves around how well brands serve as solutions to specific needs, not just as products.
- The demand framework is simultaneous—creating, capturing, and converting demand can no longer occur in sequence.

Dig deeper: From searching to delegating: Adapting to AI-first search behavior
As I think of Walt Kelly’s Pogo, I’m reminded of the risk of mistaking busyness for progress. His words cut deep: ‘Having lost sight of our objectives, we redoubled our efforts.’
I see brands scrambling to generate content tailored for this new speed of decision-making, yet without clear strategic goals, it’s just activity for activity’s sake.
Dig deeper: Why clarity now decides who survives
While the compressed customer journey is an opportunity for brands with precise positioning, it’s a trap for those without clear direction. Inconsistent brand signals lead to confusion.
Edelman highlights this issue by suggesting that brands should be seen as ‘the sum of signals’ that reveal them as solutions. I realized the journey compression issue isn’t just technological; it’s about setting clear objectives.
A question I continually ask is: What specific situation does my brand best address? If I can’t answer that concisely, AI certainly won’t be able to.
Dig deeper: Why AI availability is the new battleground for brands
Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.




















