Tag: International

  • How Meta’s New Digital Tax Policy Impacts Advertisers

    How Meta’s New Digital Tax Policy Impacts Advertisers

    I recently learned that starting July 1st, Meta plans to directly charge us, the advertisers, for Europe’s digital services taxes. This change will add as much as 5% to our ad spend, which is quite a noticeable increase.

    The numbers. The fees will align with each nation’s specific digital service tax rates, which means:

    • France, Italy, Spain: 3%
    • Austria, Turkey: 5%
    • UK: 2%

    How it works in practice. Meta has informed us that if I run a $100 ad targeting Italy, it’ll cost $103, excluding any VAT. This directly affects my budget considerations.

    The fine print. It’s important to note these fees are based on the ad’s target location, not where I, the advertiser, am based. Thus, even if I’m in the U.S., targeting users in France means I’ll adhere to their rate.

    Why I care. This upcoming change will undeniably raise costs for my European campaigns starting July 1st. With no option to avoid it, I must prepare for increased CPM and CPA benchmarks, meaning my current budget won’t go as far, and my ROAS targets might need reevaluation.

    Because these adjustments are based on delivery location, even non-European companies must take note. The reach of this change is broad.

    The big picture for advertisers. Meta’s not alone; both Google and Amazon have similar strategies. It’s a significant shift that demands I, and others involved in European advertising, revisit our cost models to appropriately plan for these increased expenses.

    The backdrop. Digital services taxes have long been contentious between Europe and Washington, adding a layer of geopolitical complexity to the already intricate compliance issues faced by global advertisers like myself.

    Dig deeper. If you’re interested in more detailed information about how Meta is addressing Europe’s digital taxes, you can find additional insights in this Bloomberg article (subscription required).


    Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.


    crushpress.ai community screenshot
  • Mastering International SEO: What Works and What Doesn’t in 2026

    Mastering International SEO: What Works and What Doesn’t in 2026

    As someone who has been deeply engaged with international SEO strategies, I’ve noticed a significant transformation in 2026. With AI-mediated searches redefining the landscape, the traditional playbook has evolved. Yet, despite these changes, certain strategies remain effective.

    For years, international SEO followed a well-trodden path: creating unique URLs for different countries and languages, localizing content, deploying hreflang, and ensuring search engines present the correct version. However, those basics aren’t enough in today’s AI-driven world.

    Today, it’s not just about ranking; it’s about how well my content is retrieved, interpreted, and validated globally. Consistent visibility hinges more on these elements than on the traditional methods we’ve relied upon.

    The elements that still perform effectively in 2026 are quite fascinating. Market-scoped URLs continue to triumph when they highlight real differences, reflecting true market variations rather than simple translations. For example, legal disclosures, pricing, and regional compliance are crucial.

    Local intent, beyond mere language translation, proves critical for content retrieval and retention. AI systems are increasingly adept at understanding when two pages address the same user intent, even across different languages.

    Although hreflang tags are still effective within traditional SERPs, their influence is somewhat diminished in AI-mediated environments where market differentiation and data clarity become essential before retrieval.

    Understanding how entities are clarified is crucial. AI systems quickly need to ascertain the company’s identity, brands, products, market context, and credibility for robust content consideration.

    Local authority signals are vital as well. AI systems now evaluate trust within specific market contexts, emphasizing local expertise and affiliations over global brand authority.

    On the flip side, several traditional strategies no longer offer the same value. Basic translation without localization fails to deliver meaningful AI response, with English versions often taking precedence globally.

    Indexing alone no longer guarantees visibility. AI retrieval now focuses on selection and prioritization of content with clear, confident disclosures.

    Moreover, individual page-centric SEO strategies fall short as AI synthesis works at the level of concepts and entities, not isolated pages.

    Uncoordinated publishing can lead to semantic drift, where AI may prioritize the most current or authoritative content, even if it’s from a less strategic market.

    In adjusting to these changes, companies must now manage international SEO as a complex system focused on trust, relevance, and alignment across global markets, rather than just a straightforward localization task.


    Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.


    crushpress.ai community screenshot