Tag: Growth Strategy

  • What Practices Should Know About Virtual Medical Assistants

    What Practices Should Know About Virtual Medical Assistants

    Administrative capacity can determine whether a healthcare practice turns patient demand into timely, consistent service or leaves its existing team struggling to keep up. Virtual medical assistants are one way to add support, but their value depends on the work assigned, the person’s qualifications, and how well the role fits the practice.

    Drawing on First Page Sage Blog’s interview with DocVA founder and CEO Nathan Barz, this guide examines the embedded staffing model, the proposed onboarding process, and the questions practice leaders should answer before making a placement.

    Administrative overload is an operational constraint

    Barz told First Page Sage Blog that many practices have demand but lack enough staff capacity to manage it effectively. He identified phone coverage, scheduling, documentation, billing support, patient follow-up, prior authorizations, and inbox work as potential pressure points.

    These are not isolated back-office duties. A delayed response can affect the patient experience, while unfinished administrative work can consume provider time and add pressure to an already busy team. The larger operational lesson is that a practice should assess whether its service infrastructure can absorb more demand before treating growth as a marketing problem alone.

    Key takeaways for practice leaders

    • Define the specific workflow bottleneck before recruiting assistance.
    • Match the candidate’s healthcare experience to the tasks the role will perform.
    • Keep ownership of systems, standards, and daily workflows inside the practice.
    • Favor continuity when the work involves patients, documentation, or clinical support.
    • Confirm that the staffing partner will remain involved after placement.

    Embedded support differs from a rotating assistant pool

    According to Barz, DocVA’s approach is to place a dedicated assistant within a practice’s existing operations instead of supplying interchangeable general administrative help. The practice retains control of its tools, procedures, and expectations, while the assistant becomes a consistent member of the daily support team.

    Barz also described a candidate base with varied healthcare backgrounds. He said it includes licensed nurses, registered pharmacists, certified billers and coders, prior authorization specialists, and experienced medical scribes. Those qualifications should not be treated as interchangeable: the appropriate background depends on the actual responsibilities of the position.

    Continuity is a central potential advantage of this model. A dedicated person can become familiar with the practice’s communication norms and recurring processes. That familiarity does not eliminate the need for clear supervision, documented procedures, access controls, and performance expectations. A virtual role still has to be managed as part of the operating team.

    Circular portrait of a smiling man beside text naming Dave Hatley as CEO of Whisper Outdoor.
    A smiling man wearing glasses and a light blue polo appears beside the heading "Executive Interview Series: Dave Hatley, CEO of Whisper Outdoor."

    A useful hiring process starts with the work, not the title

    The process Barz outlined begins with discovery: the staffing provider learns about the practice’s specialty, systems, staffing gaps, and everyday problems. DocVA then presents a shortlist of candidates, often accompanied by resumes and introductory videos, and the practice chooses whom to interview. After selection, the company helps with integration and remains available if a performance problem or mismatch emerges.

    For a practice evaluating any provider, the strongest starting point is a concrete delay or workload problem rather than a broad request for help. Leaders can identify where work accumulates, determine which activities can be assigned appropriately, and describe what successful performance would look like. They can then evaluate candidates against that defined role instead of expecting one person to solve every administrative issue.

    Fit should also include the working relationship. Relevant experience matters, but so do reliable communication, consistent availability, comfort with the practice’s systems, and a clear escalation path when a task requires someone else to decide or act.

    Growth marketing only works when operations can respond

    Barz connected staffing directly to growth: marketing may generate calls, form submissions, and appointment requests, but the practice still needs enough capacity to answer and follow up. If response workflows are overloaded, additional visibility can expose the constraint rather than resolve it.

    Virtual support may help create that capacity by taking ownership of a defined set of recurring duties. It is not an automatic remedy, and the source presents DocVA’s own perspective rather than an independent comparison of staffing options. Practice leaders should therefore judge the model by role fit, candidate qualifications, continuity, integration support, and its effect on the bottleneck they originally identified.

    The most productive next step is a workflow review: locate the delay, define the responsibility, and only then decide whether a dedicated virtual medical assistant is the right operational response.


    Inspired by this post on First Page Sage Blog.


    crushpress.ai community screenshot
  • Why Accessibility Is an $18 Trillion Marketing Advantage

    Why Accessibility Is an $18 Trillion Marketing Advantage

    Illustration of an online storefront against a green background, featuring a digital shop window, clothing items, a sold sign, and icons representing growth, accessibility, and customers.

    Every so often, I see a product launch turn into a marketing lesson bigger than the product itself. Selena Gomez’s Rare Beauty did that with a new fragrance, but it was not only the scent that drew attention. The bottle became the story. Its accessible, easy-to-use packaging sparked conversation, earned praise from accessibility advocates, and reminded me how powerful inclusive design can be when it is built into the product from the start.

    For me, the lesson is clear: accessibility is not a side note. It can become the campaign. One thoughtful design choice created cultural impact that would be hard to buy with media spend alone. It also showed why accessibility can build loyalty, strengthen brand reputation, support compliance, and drive measurable growth.

    Accessibility as a campaign strategy

    I do not see Rare Beauty’s accessibility work as a one-off moment. From packaging to pricing to its ongoing mental health advocacy, the brand has consistently made inclusivity part of its identity. That matters because consumers can usually tell when a brand is chasing attention versus when it is acting from a real strategy. They reward brands that lead with values and follow through.

    Rare Beauty is not alone. I see leading brands across industries using accessibility as a differentiator, not a footnote. Apple often frames accessibility features as part of product innovation. Microsoft has brought inclusive design into mainstream campaigns, including adaptive gaming products that positioned accessibility as a source of creativity and connection. In fashion and retail, brands like Tommy Hilfiger and Unilever have put adaptive design into product launches and brand identity instead of treating it as a niche offering.

    Studies from Edelman and McKinsey show why this shift matters. According to those studies, 73% of Gen Z choose to buy from brands they believe in, and 70% say they try to purchase products from companies they consider ethical. I do not see those as fringe preferences. I see them as mainstream expectations that should change how marketers build trust and growth.

    The $18 trillion market marketers overlook

    More than 1.3 billion people globally live with a disability. Together with their friends and family, they control more than $18 trillion in spending power, according to the Return on Disability Group. I believe marketers should view this as more than a compliance issue. It is a growth opportunity, a reputation opportunity, and a trust-building opportunity with one of the world’s largest and most passionate consumer groups.

    That passion often turns into advocacy. In discussions with AudioEye’s A11iance Team, a group of individuals with disabilities who regularly share feedback on real-world accessibility experiences, one member said, “If I find a website that works and works very well for me, I will always recommend it to friends and family because I want people to have the same experience that I have.”

    Another A11iance Team member, Maxwell Ivey, put it this way: “The cheapest form of advertising is word of mouth, and people with disabilities can have some of the loudest voices when we find people willing to make the effort. Because it’s that sincere effort over time that really counts with us.”

    When accessibility becomes part of the customer experience, I see it create something media budgets cannot easily buy: trust and loyalty that scale through advocacy. But the reverse is also true. In a survey of assistive technology users, 54% said they do not feel eCommerce companies care about earning their business.

    That should get every marketer’s attention. Too many brands are still fighting for the same crowded audience segments while overlooking a major opportunity in plain sight. When they do, they leave loyalty, advocacy, and revenue on the table.

    Here is where I see many brands stumble: accessibility often stops at the shelf. Marketers invest heavily in packaging, store displays, and product design, while digital experiences lag behind. Yet those digital experiences are often the first and most important touchpoints customers have with a brand.

    As accessibility-led design earns more attention, loyalty, and earned media, the gap between physical product innovation and digital experience becomes harder to ignore.

    AudioEye’s 2025 Digital Accessibility Index found an average of 297 accessibility issues per web page detectable by automation alone. Each issue can create friction in the customer journey, cost a conversion, or introduce compliance risk under frameworks such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the European Accessibility Act (EAA).

    I would not launch a campaign without a brand review or a legal check. In the same way, I do not think any digital touchpoint should go live without an accessibility review.

    Four moves marketing leaders can make

    Too often, I see accessibility treated as a risk to manage instead of an advantage to use. The marketers who gain ground will be the ones who change that mindset. I would start with four practical moves.

    1. Make accessibility your campaign hook

    I would not hide accessibility in the fine print. I would lead with it. Brands like Rare Beauty have shown that inclusive design is the story. Build campaigns where accessibility is not an afterthought, but the differentiator that earns attention and loyalty.

    2. Bake it into your brand system

    Accessibility should not sit off to the side. I would make Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) alignment part of the brand system, right alongside typography, logos, and tone of voice. When accessibility is documented and expected, it becomes easier to apply across every campaign.

    3. Use data as your proof point

    Marketers are storytellers, but numbers strengthen the story. I would track accessibility improvements such as fewer user-reported barriers, higher accessibility scores, stronger alt text, better color contrast, and more usable forms. Then I would connect those metrics to business outcomes like conversion, reach, and sentiment to show how accessibility drives ROI, not just compliance.

    4. Protect accessibility like brand safety

    I would treat accessibility with the same seriousness as brand safety. Every update, seasonal campaign, and product drop should be monitored for accessibility. Trust and reputation are too valuable to leave exposed.

    The competitive advantage

    Rare Beauty’s fragrance launch proved something important to me: when a brand leads with accessibility, the story can write itself. Loyalty builds more authentically, and momentum feels more natural because the value is real.

    The larger opportunity is that many brands still do not see it. They continue to treat accessibility as a compliance checkbox when it can be a growth strategy.

    For marketers, that is the wake-up call. Accessibility builds loyalty. It strengthens brand reputation. It supports compliance. And it can drive measurable growth across marketing efforts.

    Rare Beauty showed how accessibility can capture attention at the shelf. Now I see the next opportunity clearly: making sure that same accessibility carries through online. When every touchpoint welcomes everyone, every campaign has a better chance to deliver its full impact.


    Inspired by this post on Search Engine Land.


    crushpress.ai community screenshot